links for 2008-04-30

April 30, 2008 - Leave a Response

links for 2008-04-29

April 29, 2008 - Leave a Response

Concepting Interactive Installations

April 29, 2008 - Leave a Response

Whilst trying to concept my interactive installation based around global warming I think its worth noting down a few key things I’ve learned today. Always work through each concept and idea all the way through to work out if it will be possible before formalising the design. Ensure you know how you would use sensors – where they would be placed, how they would interact etc – not just “these are the sensors i need”

Oh and make sure no one has done it before.

And become an electrical engineer overnight… that is always useful.

Check out antenna… they do good stuff.

Post Recession – Mainstream web

April 29, 2008 - Leave a Response

Really interesting article by Bernard Dunn on ReadWriteWeb. It is important to realise that this impending economic downturn is different from the first dot com crash. The web is now mainstream and there is no avoiding that for both businesses and consumers.There are new opportunities but also new threats so check it out…

links for 2008-04-28

April 28, 2008 - Leave a Response

Ich Bin Ein Berliner

April 28, 2008 - Leave a Response

It’s been a while, I’ve been on a class trip to Berlin. Many highlights, mostly partying related which is always good but one non-drinking related highlight that really did stand out was visiting art+com as speaking with Jussi an interaction designer there. They specialise in interactive installationsIt is a great company, really friendly and open and they also do great work. I am currently proposing an interactive installation based around the issue of global warming and they have been a big inspiration.

links for 2008-04-27

April 27, 2008 - Leave a Response

links for 2008-04-11

April 11, 2008 - Leave a Response

links for 2008-04-09

April 9, 2008 - Leave a Response

Information Democracy – Positive or Negative?

April 9, 2008 - Leave a Response

I believe that the cult of web 2.0 has brought with it a culture of information democracy, and that in many ways this has decentralised power from the “establishment” and brought it to the “people”… dependent on how you interpret those definitions. This has had more effect in certain areas than others, in business for example, web 2.0 has brought about a massive change in customers relationships to businesses, no longer does the consumer have no voice. There have been numerous examples of reputations being severely damaged by the actions (often blogs) of just a few unhappy customers – think Dell for a moment…

In politics I think there has been less physical examples of democratisation of information as a result of web 2.0. Unfortunately all too often in areas of the world where this democratisation and freedom information is desperately needed (the name China springs to mind amongst others) it is held back from the people and many digital information activists opposing this are arrested or far worse. This withstanding I think that the potential and scope for political transparency through freedom of information is there.

However it is (unsurprisingly) the world of media where web 2.0 and the freedom of information and culture of community and participation where the most change has been felt. Power has shifted from the so called gatekeepers of media, the “establishment” – newspaper editors, record producers, journalists to the “people”… and who are these “people”… well as contrived and overused as it may sound they are the kids (and adult kids) making videos on youtube, unsigned bands putting their music online and all those contributors to wikipedia, amongst many others.

It is wikipedia, perhaps one of the most iconic examples of a web 2.0 application where the focus of the Dutch filmmaker IJsbrand van Veelen recent documentary lies. It questions whether this “information democracy” created by web 2.0 in general (but focusing on wikipedia) is actually benefiting society, or whether it is detrimental. The main protagonist toward this viewpoint in the film is Andrew Keens, author of The Cult of the Amateur who argues that web 2.0 is creating an individualistic society where truth has become a personal viewpoint not an absolute fact. The evangelists of web 2.0 such as Tim O’Reilly and the Wikipedia founders Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales amongst others dispute this and the very notion of the absolute truth; is this not constantly evolving, just like wikipedia?

However what is interesting to me here is that although it is just focusing on one specific application (wikipedia) the argument is really a wider one between two ideals that have been conflicting for the last fifty years; liberalism and socialism. On one side lies chaos and genius and on the other lies order and education… it is the rebels vs the establishment…

Watch the full documentary here: